Hi Jillaine,
Firstly, why do you find my anonymity such an
issue? These are my words; take them or leave them; all I ask of anyone is
that they search out their truth; all I know is Pita Pangari and the NKKWTB
have proven to me that they don't believe in free and open communication; please
read their emails and make up your own mind.
Secondly, I'm not sure you're reading me correctly;
when did I say Pita Pangari wasn't Maori? Also, when did I slander other
individuals?
Lastly, I've raised the next generation, in a
healthy and educated way, and I hope you've taught your children enough to
survive the realities of our world, good luck!
Regards, Paeara
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:21
PM
Hi "Anonymous"
You appear to take
what you want from text and turn it into what you want to hear. If your words
were as valid as you claim, why the secrecy. I don't quite understand that.
You're quite open to slander other individuals but lay claim that it not
necessary to name yourself. Strange.
As for calling Pita "pitiful etc". I
didn't do that at all. I was saying that it was pitiful that you lay target to
a man "because" he wasn't born Maori and yet he strives to fight for Maori. I
may have read you wrong but the implication in what you wrote (and it is in
the discussion threads for your perusal) is that a person born white into a
Maori family has no credibility. I think you'll find as you look around you
that, that is such a farce and detrimental to our future 'mostly quite white'
children.
Within the discussion threads there was also an invitation for
you and those you represent to attend Trust meetings.. general meetings open
to all. It seems you opted not to but I'm sure why, you didn't explain
that.
My only protest is the manner in which you openly attack,
disparage rather than engage in healthy debate about the way forward. You're a
traveled and learned person as you say, you should know that most people let
alone Maori won't take anyone seriously that whispers behind anonymous email
names. Would you take anyone seriously if they refused to identify themselves.
I don't quite understand, if there is so much at stake for you and for Taemaro
people generally as you say, then doesn't it make sense to say it out loud and
in person to those that "apparently" aren't representing you appropriately?
Seriously, have you gained anything by being adversarial? Probably not. Then
does it not make sense to find another more collaborative way to achieve the
desired outcomes that you iwi deserve?
I don't disagree with the purpse
of your cause. I absolutely support equal respresentation in any issue. I
disagree with your methods and disrepectful manner in which you carry
yourself. Find a smarter and more mature way to dialogue.
What am I doing?
Raising the next generation and the one beyond, in a healthy and educated way
so that they may engage without intimidation and anger. I also work in Mental
Health hoping that one day our people will get smarter about the way in which
they treat each other and hopefully reduce the statistics of suicide, violence
and imprisonment of our kids. You know, being nasty is learned behaviour and
it can be unlearned too.
Regards
Jillaine
Thomas
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:49 PM,
<paeara@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
Hi
Jillaine,
I'm not sure that you understand what this website is for,
it was launched because the NKKWTB refused to answer any of my questions. If
you read the emails between myself and the NKKWTB, in particular the
chairperson, you can judge for yourself. I have nothing to prove to you I've
simply provided this non-judgemental, non-religious and non-political
website for open discussion.
What you don't seem to understand is
that the opinions expressed in the discussion thread are not all mine, I
identify myself as paeara@ihug.co.nz when I have something to say, others
identify themselves as well; such as Marie Paul, Tim Blackheart and Peter
(Hohepa) Joseph; however most don't wish to identify themselves and
represent their comments as "Anonymous".
e.g
Re: Ngati Aukiwa is
fighting for their land
Submitted by Anonymous on 25 December 2007 -
2:23am.
As for your reference in the discussion threads which refer
to Pita Pangaru being pitiful and disrespectful I can't find those specific
words; however please correct me.
As for Pita Pangari; I've emailed
and phoned him a number of times but he has never bothered to call or email
me back. Every hui I attend he doesn't turn up to; personally I find it a
problem when someone who claims to represent my interest refuses to talk to
me; this isn't just Pita it is the entire trust board. You try asking them a
question about how they work, how they are voted in, how their accounts are
audited etc; if you get anything of sustance from them I'm more than happy
to publish it on this website.
I have thanked Pita Pangari for all of
his work to date however what Pita fails to understand is that he doesn't
represent the majoity anymore; please read Marie Paul's comment in the
discussion threads; she was one of his greatest supporters and believed what
he told her; however now she no longer supports him; these aren't my word
they are Maire Paul's. Additionally, there were over 200 protestors at
Taemaro all of whom didn't agree with Pita Pangari's deal with the
government. The problem I have is that Pita Pangari and the trust board
don't listen to their on iwi.
As for being pathetic; I've created
this website; I've challenged Pita Pangari because I don't like the way he
operates and mis-represents himself and my iwi; I am channelling my energies
for the wider cause; what are you doing?
Regards, Paeara
Family
----- Original Message ----- From: <jillaine.thomas@gmail.com>
To: <paeara@ihug.co.nz>
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 8:54
PM
Subject: Email from www.ngatikahukiwhangaroa.com
Email
from www.ngatikahukiwhangaroa.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name:
Jillaine Thomas
Message: Your end of the discussion thread re: Pita
Pangaru was pitiful and disrespectful. Contrary to your website claim you
are judgmental and quite rude. Peter may have been adopted (eons ago) but
you miss the point completely. Peter stayed and challenged the government
when you and I were off elsewhere doing whatever. Now you want to trash
him for giving a shit about Maori today and tomorrow. You\'re pathetic to
yourself and to the rest of us who recognise that we didn\'t have the
strength to stay and challenge when we probably should have.
Channel
your energies where they\'re best utilised for the wider cause or do what
you do best and just
whinge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------